🔗 Share this article

The nation's decisive move to ban social media access for those under 16 is sparking debate worldwide. Politicians, child protection groups, and guardians are observing intently to see if this tactic will set a precedent for other nations.

European Momentum

In Europe, a increasing number of countries are exploring parallel restrictions.

• The Danish government has stated a restriction on social media for under-15s, with the leader arguing that mobile devices and apps are "stealing our kids' childhood". A law could be enacted soon.
• The Norwegian government is preparing to introduce a age restriction of 15, pointing to the need to protect children from the "power of the recommendation systems".
• Ireland is developing a digital ID system to verify the age and identity of social media participants. Officials have suggested that an Australia-style ban is "one of the options under consideration".
• In Spain, the leader has urged lawmakers to pass a proposal raising the access age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has floated the idea of a ban for under-15s, and a legislative committee has suggested a related move, alongside an overnight "screen time restriction" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The administration in The Dutch government has advised guardians to prevent their kids from social media up to the age of 15.

Across the European Union, the EU parliament has passed a symbolic motion demanding a ban for minors unless guardian approval is granted. While it warns of the "habit-forming" quality of these platforms, the resolution does not establish binding law.

"A strong age limit is a useful first step," commented one European lawmaker supporting the resolution.

The United Kingdom: A Cautious Approach

In the UK, the administration has remained open to a possible ban, stating that "nothing is off the table" but insisting any policy must be "supported by conclusive data".

Earlier, momentum grew behind a legislative effort to enact limits on social media use by teenagers, but it was ultimately modified. However, the administration vowed to conduct more studies the topic.

Campaign organizations have raised warnings. An organization set up by the relatives of a teenager who took her own life after viewing dangerous platform posts contends that a strict age ban might not protect children and could create a "cliff edge" of risk when users become eligible.

"The Australian ban is a response to the refusal of the Silicon Valley to create platforms and apps that are secure and suitable for minors," stated a prominent online safety campaigner.

The US: A Decentralized Landscape

In the United States, regulation is largely happening at the regional level amid national inaction.

• Utah mandates parental consent for those under 18 to use social media and controls overnight use.
• The state of Florida has signed a measure banning under-14s from creating accounts on social media, though it is entangled in constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has approved a rule limiting under-16s to 60 minutes of social media access per day, with extra use needing adult consent.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly introduced bills requiring guardian approval for under-16s to create social media accounts.

Despite bipartisan support and suggestions from some politicians to follow Australia's path, a US-wide ban is presently seen as unlikely.

Global Perspectives

Apart from these regions, additional countries are also considering moves.

• Malaysia intends to ban social media for under-16s beginning next year.
• Brazil has increased the required age for the platform Instagram to 16.

But, global bodies take a more measured tone. The UN children's agency has warned that age-based restrictions pose dangers and "could prove counterproductive". The agency notes that social networks can be a "lifeline" for isolated children and that bans should not be a "replacement" for tech companies to improve user protection.

As this global discussion evolves, the actions of this nation and others demonstrate that states internationally are increasingly prepared to stand by for the industry to self-regulate.